Docket#Docket#

Type: RF. So published request

Date: Comments must be received before

1/1/202, midnight, EST

Method: Comments should be submitted through the federal register/other:

Link Link

Summary:

Paragraph or two summary or 1 paragraph and 5-7 bullets

PHAPHA/PHLPHL- identified impacts:

• A large state PHA is concerned that green ceilings don’t match their decor

• A territory PHA is concerned about redefining urgent - significant workflow impacts

• NYC (if willing to be IDed directly, consider naming?) is concerned that this would effectively end their productive relationship with their city HIEs

• A mid-size midwestern PHL cannot do this work without additional funding and asks if CDC has comments/thoughts on potential funding mechanisms

• etc.

Top 5 areas of requested feedback from PHA/Ls, partners, etc:

1. thing 1

2. thing 2

3. thing 3

4. thing 4

5. thing 5

Thing 1

search for

‘section 4.2’

• (fake) Will require PH to be certified by ONC without additional funding

  • Do PHAs have funding for this? Do you anticipate meeting these requirements today/soon?

Thing 2

search for ‘public health reporting’ - multiple places

• (fake) Will set up a new department for disease reporting from locals

  • What are your concerns about changes to disease reporting? What would help you? Could you talk about problems you face today with dz reporting?

• (fake) this new department would be able to get your data first

  • What are your concerns about getting access to your data after this new department?

  • etc.

Thing 3

search for ‘data reporting standards’ and look at the cluster about halfway through policy

• (fake) … Will require PH to be certified by ONC without additional funding

  • Do PHAs have funding for this? Do you anticipate meeting these requirements today/soon?

Thing 4

search for ‘green ceiling’

• (fake) …Will require PH to be certified by ONC without additional funding

  • Do PHAs have funding for this? Do you anticipate meeting these requirements today/soon?

Thing 5

search for early ‘definitions’ section, then ‘urgent’ term

• (fake) …Will require PH to be certified by ONC without additional funding

  • Do PHAs have funding for this? Do you anticipate meeting these requirements today/soon?

Additional potential impacts or language of interest

• requires labs to paint ceilings green

• requires them to do this within the next 2w

• redefines “urgent”

• policy impacts unclear, potential for CD reporting impacts

• and also

• and

• misc too

• other

• findings

• longer

• stuff

• k.

• potential clash with existing wall color

• .

• .

• potential for wide-ranging impacts if language adopted

• .

• .

• potential impacts to jurisdictions who run their own STI or other clinics

• .

• .

• .

• potential for impact to tribal nations - does this restrict data access?

maybe

Additional space for notes or additional comments or etc from partners:

Should we request an extension of comment period?

HL7 has asked us to provide input on how requiring FHIR ELR messaging in 2025 would impact PHA pre-processing, reporting, and PHL LIMs projects.