POLICY NAME
Agency (ONC/FDA/etc)
Docket#
POLICY NAME | ||
|---|---|---|
Agency e.g., ONC, FDA, HHS | Docket# | Type: NPRM |
Date: Comments must be received before | ||
1/1/202, midnight, EST
: [enter deadline] | Method: Comments should be submitted through the federal register/other: | |
[add link] | ||
Summary: | ||
Paragraph or two summary or 1 paragraph and 5-7 bullets
PHA/PHL- identified impacts:
A large state PHA is concerned that green ceilings don’t match their decor
A territory PHA is concerned about redefining urgent - significant workflow impacts
NYC (if willing to be IDed directly, consider naming?) is concerned that this would effectively end their productive relationship with their city HIEs
A mid-size midwestern PHL cannot do this work without additional funding and asks if CDC has comments/thoughts on potential funding mechanisms
etc.
Top 5 areas of requested feedback from PHA/Ls, partners, etc:
thing 1
thing 2
thing 3
thing 4
thing 5
Thing 1
search for ‘section 4.2’
(fake) Will require PH to be certified by ONC without additional funding
Do PHAs have funding for this? Do you anticipate meeting these requirements today/soon?
Thing 2
search for ‘public health reporting’ - multiple places
(fake) Will set up a new department for disease reporting from locals
What are your concerns about changes to disease reporting? What would help you? Could you talk about problems you face today with dz reporting?
(fake) this new department would be able to get your data first
What are your concerns about getting access to your data after this new department?
etc.
Thing 3
search for ‘data reporting standards’ and look at the cluster about halfway through policy
(fake) … Will require PH to be certified by ONC without additional funding
Do PHAs have funding for this? Do you anticipate meeting these requirements today/soon?
Thing 4
search for ‘green ceiling’
(fake) …Will require PH to be certified by ONC without additional funding
Do PHAs have funding for this? Do you anticipate meeting these requirements today/soon?
Thing 5
search for early ‘definitions’ section, then ‘urgent’ term
(fake) …Will require PH to be certified by ONC without additional funding
Do PHAs have funding for this? Do you anticipate meeting these requirements today/soon?
Additional potential impacts or language of interest
requires labs to paint ceilings green
requires them to do this within the next 2w
redefines “urgent”
policy impacts unclear, potential for CD reporting impacts
and also
and
misc too
other
findings
longer
stuff
k.
potential clash with existing wall color
.
.
potential for wide-ranging impacts if language adopted
.
.
potential impacts to jurisdictions who run their own STI or other clinics
.
.
.
potential for impact to tribal nations - does this restrict data access?
maybe
Additional space for notes or additional comments or etc from partners:
Should we request an extension of comment period?
Brief summary of the rule. More detailed impacts and/or specific questions can be provided for each priority area of interest. | ||
Identified Impacts for Public Health Laboratories | ||
Priority Areas for Requested Feedback: | ||
Topic Area 1: Questions for Feedback & Discussion | ||
High-Level Topic Summary: Feedback Needed:
| ||
Topic Area 2: Questions for Feedback & Discussion | ||
High-Level Topic Summary: Feedback Needed:
| ||
Topic Area 3: Questions for Feedback & Discussion | ||
High-Level Topic Summary: Feedback Needed:
|