Upcoming OOO | | |
Specimen CMT - review of terms with questions | specimen condition and reject reason work | No | | Here is the confluence page where OO is tracking this project: https://confluence.hl7.org/display/OO/Specimen+Condition+and+Specimen+Reject+Reason+Vocabulary #2 international standard for biobanking: the ISO 20387:2018 - is anyone member and has access? Annex A lists some requirements regarding documented information during sample acquisition (see A.2 Acquisition) Annex B gives a list of examples for the respective requirements mentioned in Annex A (see B.2 Acquisition). Based on the acceptance criteria 'reject reasons' can be deduced.Missing SCT codes for these condition concepts - any help needed? Sample not received on dry ice Sample container broken Sample identification mismatched to order Sample without test requisition (order) Patient name misspelling Missing collector ID Sample label unreadable Sample missing patient identification Limited evaluation due to broken container Limited evaluation due to broken slide Limited evaluation due to leaking container |
Specimen CMT - review of terms with questions | | |
Previous Action Items
| | |
Specimen CMT pilot implementers | No | |
Specimen CMT - Hosting Options | Yes | How can we publish the content in the dB? How do we decide what format to share this in - get input from EHR-s and LIS vendors. Write letter of mulitple stakeholders to request EHR-s and LIS vendors to implement indicating that this is a patient safety issue, as incorrect Abx treatment will contribute to multi-drug resistance (use CTSI findings to provide background) Nancy is talking to DHQP about the linkage with specimen collection While we have HIT certification that is for the EHR-s there is currently no enforcement for implementation at the organizations need C-suite buy-in Professional organizations - like CAP and ACOS and AJCC get them to write the synoptic reports (better structuring of data) - for surgical aspects - similar to what CAP has done for Cancer (though they do not have the SCT codes included in the past - may be including SNOMED CT starting in 2025, but they are also using the SCT codes for observables) https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/news-publications/news-and-articles/bulletin/2021/12/synoptic-reporting-for-cancer-surgery-current-requirements-and-future-state/: The four CoC accreditation standards that include synoptic operative reporting requirements apply to sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer (Standard 5.3), axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer (Standard 5.4), wide local excision for primary cutaneous melanoma (Standard 5.5), and colonic resection for colon cancer (Standard 5.6). These accreditation standards were developed from the evidence-based recommendations for cancer surgery detailed in the Operative Standards for Cancer Surgery manuals.7,8 try to get AMA support to get providers to adopt this Reach out to IDSA, too
|
Specimen CMT - education | Yes | Need education for providers and IT folks that helps with set up of the EHR-S / LIS configuration if we have a use case of how a patient is impacted on their journey through the healthcare system - CAP created a nice video that showed how patient care was affected by incorrect data https://infobeta.cap.org/shield/
|
Specimen CMT - tracking implementation impact Setting baseline Define metrics
| No | |
Specimen CMT - Compare to NHS Medical Terminology testing | No | Will get updated vocab at a later date |
LOINC to SNOMED CT mapping | No | |
Future projects for this call after CMT | No | |
)