Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Topic

Notes

Reviewing minutes from the last call - Action Item Follow up

Call Schedule

send OOO via chat or email

 LIDR White Paper Review

Reviewing the comments on the LIDR White Paper = LIDR White Paper

  • Need to check reference style and pick one

  • Reviewed comments on introduction - Still need to check for best place to talk about CLSI AUTO-16/IHE LAW (question: has anyone implemented in the US in production?)

  • Review updated LIDR content creation diagram:

    • What kind f content would come from FDA?

      • CLIA setting, at home use etc

      • maybe additional elements from the package insert once test is approved and that information is public

      • Need to make sure the linkage for any feedback / additionally submitted content is properly linked to the correct LIDR entry

        • Hung found some LIVD entries has split rows - Russ is checking for the exact examples

    • Does distribution include naming convention?

      • different labs may create different names for the same test

      • would the unqiue LIDR row ID help with that?

      • don't want to get hung up on single id again - labs need to report based on the LIDR fingerprint (all the correctly coded data like LOINC, SCT, proper specimen infomration, unit sof measure, UDI

    • Note that this diagram does not include the details of distribution - we left this here to make clear that content doesn’t just go into LIDR, but also comes back out - but there is feedback ability - hence the double-arrows

    • What if a lab decides to report slightly different from how the maunufacturer prefers - example Flu A/B test or HIV 1/2 test - manufacturer has single nominal results vs lab sets these up as 2 individual tests with ordinal test - both are valid and the latter is often used to ensure that display for provider is not changed in a way that information could get lost

      • LIDR administrator can make those updates

      • Who is the LIDR administrator - needs to be impartial

      • Ideally SHIELD community administers LIDR

      • In Figure 7 there is “Labs' conformance to LIDR' - what happens if the update is not in LIDR?

        • no reason for not including, unless mapping is incorrect

    • How does feedback from the labs to vendor work?

      • Via LIDR and or direct

    • Diagram ready to beautify - Russ will ask Peyton and team to do

  • Roadmap for LIDR - how do we make LIDR a reality?

    • Riki just drafted - ideally should become an actual tool, but that will need funding and assurance of impartial administation

    • may not move forward on just goodwill

    • Xavier might be able to help with the FHIR pilot of LIVD

  • Other notes:

    • Hung was approached by Siemens after his article https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2024.0323 which mentioned SHIELD LIDR - fingers corssed crossed we can get them to join/support

      • Pam has worked with Siemens in the past on LOINC mapping and teaching about LIVD format in US

      • This is from Norway

ACTION ITEMS

All read the roadmap and the how to get invovled

Review on 11/04 then send to Steering Committee for review and vote 11/05 or the next

Next call

Monday 11/04/2024 9:05 - 9:55 AM ET

Adjourned

9:55 AM ET

Action items

  •