...
...
...
...
...
...
The
...
The following tables outline the technical considerations for public health laboratories (PHLs) and healthcare organizations (HCOs) implementing ETOR exchange via the APHL Intermediary.APHL’s Detor solution.
Table of Contents | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
...
Public Health Laboratories (PHLs) - Technical Considerations
Technical Component | Considerations | Notes |
---|---|---|
Transport Method Options |
|
| While |
Detor can support other transport methods, S3 and |
SFTP are preferred given functionality, resiliency, and versatility. | ||
Network/Firewall Requirements |
| Network/firewall components are directly linked to PHL transport methods. |
Message Payload Options |
| Any of the outlined file formats are compatible with |
Detor as long as the LIMS 1) is capable of importing sufficient order information and 2) contains |
fields for the data elements necessary to create a result. |
Data Field |
Recommendations | The |
recommended data fields for the in-scope test(s) |
will be defined during Gap Analysis discussions with both the PHL and HCO. | This allows for the creation of orders and results in the LIMS. | |
LIMS Capability Requirements |
| Additional LIMS configurations may be necessary. If so, APHL will collaborate with the PHL to assist in communicating needs to the LIMS vendor. |
Integration Engine | No integration engine required for message transformations. | APHL |
does not recommend the |
use of an integration engine for transformation of data for Detor exchange. Note: No integration engine should be needed if the LIMS can import/export data. If the LIMS cannot import/export data, APHL will work with the LIMS |
vendor to communicate updates needed. |
Out of Scope Related Components
APHL developing the code to allow data to be imported/exported from the LIMS. (can write some script but not everything)
Detor Data Storage | Detor adheres to the following storage requirements:
| Storage requirements were defined based on CLIA guidelines. |
Healthcare Organizations (HCOs) - Technical Considerations
Technical Component |
---|
Considerations | Notes | |
---|---|---|
Transport Method Options |
| While |
Detor can support other transport methods, RESTful, FHIR and MLLP / VPN are preferred given functionality, resiliency, and versatility. | |
Network/Firewall Requirements |
|
|
| Network/firewall components are directly linked to |
HCO transport methods. |
Message Payload Options |
| Any of the outlined file formats are compatible with |
Detor as long as the EHR 1) |
contains fields for the data elements necessary to create |
an order and 2) is capable of importing sufficient result information. |
Data Field |
Recommendations | The |
recommended data fields for the in-scope test(s) |
will be defined during Gap Analysis discussions with both the PHL and HCO. | This allows for the creation of orders and consumption of results in the EHR. |
EHR Capability Requirements |
|
|
|
Integration Engine
No integration engine required.
APHL recommends the LIMS not use and/or not have relevant data flow through.
Note: No integration engine should be needed if the LIMS can import/export data. If the LIMS cannot import/export data, APHL will work with the LIMS representative to communicate updates needed.
Out of Scope Related Components
APHL developing the code to make changes to the EHR.
| ||
Detor Data Storage | Detor adheres to the following storage requirements:
| Storage requirements were defined based on CLIA guidelines. |