Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current Restore this Version View Page History

Version 1 Next »

Present

Name

Organization

Regrets

Nancy Cornish

CDC

Regrets

Manjula Gama-Ralalage

CDC

X

Riki Merrick

APHL

X

Christina Gallegos

APHL

Regrets

Amy Lui

Inductive Health / APHL

Regrets

Raj Dash

Duke / CAP

Regrets

John Snyder

National Library of Medicine (SNOMED CT)

X

Andrea Pitkus

UW

X

Kathy Walsh

Labcorp

X

Rob Hausam

Hausam Consulting

X

Doug Franklin

APHL

 

Pam Banning

3M

Discussion topics

Item

Notes

Upcoming OOO

  • none so far (smile)

Review call notes from last week

  • Discussed migration to confluence

  • TRUU-Lab Follow up (see topics to further discuss below)

  • Specimen CMT determining baseline status (discussion from today see topic below)

Review LabMCoP confluence space

  • space NOT set up as open space, so need to adjust

TRUU-Lab follow up

  • Support for educational offerings

  • SHIELD involvement

NOT DISCUSSED

Santa Fee Project hosting Clinical Lab 2.0 March 6 & 7

NOT DISCUSSED

Reporting Biomarkers to Cancer registries

NOT DISCUSSED

Specimen CMT - Progress

https://app.smartsheet.com/sheets/h6JWqw5v9pwvrqWMq9r4g85CXjv9M8VvVqvHRwc1?view=grid

Christina completed her terms, Manjula still working on his terms

there are several that need review - next week

Specimen CMT - Hosting Options

NOT DISCUSSED

Specimen CMT - education

NOT DISCUSSED

Specimen CMT - potential pilot sites

  • IA PHL - would like to ensure that envrionmental is covered in the long-term, but open to review the content

  • LIS vendors

  • EHR-s vendors

  • Terminology Services = reached out to Clincial Architecture

  • IVD vendors to help promote the use?

  • Andrea will see, if she can use the Specimen CMT content in their cancer project and report back

Specimen CMT - tracking implementation impact

  • Setting baseline

  • Define metrics

  • Setting baseline

    • Some ideas:

      • Like the idea of ONC survey:

        • of physicians / surgeons / other providers that collect specimen - focus on collection procedure, speicmen type, source site

        • of labs to see what they can receive AND what they can send out to PH / cancer registries etc

        • Maybe ask APHL to ensure coverage of PHLs

        • Maybe ask ASCP / CAP specifically for pathology labs

      • Check on coverage of specimen terms in EPIC system during connectathon for Cancer Reporting FHIR IG?

      • Could the CAP cancer protocol for specimen use the CMT to populate their drop down?

Specimen CMT - Compare to NHS Medical Terminology testing

NOT DISCUSSED

Specimen CMT - review of terms with questions

NOT DISCUSSED

Future projects for this call after CMT

  • In general the call is intended as a forum for ANY messaging related issues to work out.

  • In the past we have

    • reviewed containers in the past - cound re-vive that - and how does that interact with devices (UDI identification?)

    • started work on cross-mapping between HL7 method codes and SNOMED CT procedure / technique concepts

      • American College of Surgeons is working on procedure protocol and synoptic data elements / surgical synoptic reports - we could work with them together on that

Recording of the call:

https://www.aphlweb.org/aphl_departments/Strategic_Initiatives_and_Research/IPMG/ConfigMgt/LabMCoP/Meeting Notes/2023-02-23 12.09.08 LabMCoP Calls.zip

Action items

  •  

Quick decisions not requiring context or tracking

For quick, smaller decisions that do not require extra context or formal tracking, use the “Add a decision…” function here.

    Decisions requiring context or tracking

    For decisions that require more context (e.g., documentation of discussion, options considered) and/or tracking, use the decision template to capture more information.