Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current Restore this Version View Page History

« Previous Version 8 Next »

Membership - who do we need input from?

  • Standard Development Organizations

    • Regenstrief

    • SNOMED International

    • HL7

  • Federal agencies

    • FDA

    • CDC

    • NLM

    • NIH

    • CMS

  • Implementers (Labs, also cross-pollinate with implementation subcommittee)

    • Health Partners

    • University of Nebraska

    • Intermountain Healthcare

    • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

  • IVD Industry (also cross-pollinate with industry subcommittee)

    • IICC representatives

    • Abbott

    • Biomerieux

    • Roche

  • LIS/LIMS vendors

    • Epic

    • Cerner (reached out)

  • Terminology Services (also cross-pollinate with tooling subcommittee)

    • 3M

    • IMO

    • Clinical Architecture

  • Professional associations

    • Association of Public Health Laboratories (currently maintains the COVID-19 LIVD file)

    • College of American Pathologists (CAP)

    • ASCP

    • ASCLS

  • Others?

Industry Impact

Incentives

  • Providing review of mappings

  • Requirements in regulations (for example support for keeping mappings updated to the latest version (with an “as date”) of the mapped to standards)

  • Like to see that data instances of test data is being collected for regulatory use – so FDA would need to share the requirements

  • Industry is being asked by customers to provide LOINC mapping (not so much SNOMED codes yet) because there is a requirement for reporting to PH as well as for MU to have the tests be represented using LOINC

  • ONC should clearly state that LOINC mapping is still required and needs to be maintained (and at what frequency-i.e. per LOINC manual 90 days after release)

Issues

  • Vendors thought that the FDA would hold them accountable for encouraging “off-label use” based on the interpretation of the LOINC code(s) published

  • Vendors may want to limit access to their mappings to paying customers only (or at least know who is downloading LIVD files)

  • Vendors operate internationally, so need to ensure mappings are not just US regulation focused

  • Will IVD vendors provide all LOINCs for an analyte/assay, including all timed, challenge, stimulation/suppression, calculated, ratios, etc.? (even those which the IVD vendor may be unaware on instance basis such as which challenge, stimulant, suppression was used for a lab’s protocol for endocrine tests-glucose, insulin, growth hormone, ACTH, cortisol, etc.?)

    • 300+ glucose tolerance tests. 75 g bolus 1 hour post glucola challenge

    • 2 hr timed urine calcium

    • Serum Calcium/Creatinine ratio; Spot Urine Calcium/Creatinine Ratio

    • Total Volume, specimen source and Ask at Order Entry (AOE) LOINCs

    • “generic interpretations” (not specific for any test result) Immunologist review of results; Coagulation panel interpretation, Service Comment, etc.

    • Calculated tests: eGFR (each formula such as male/female), 24 hr urine calcium rate (utilizing hours of collection and total volume in the calculation),

    • What level of granularity of LOINC is provided?

      • serum glucose

      • serum glucose post challenge

      • serum glucose 1 hour post challenge

      • serum glucose 1 hr post challenge glucose

      • serum glucose 1 hr post 100g glucose challenge

      • serum glucose 1 hr post 100g glucose oral bolus challenge

  • What about test results where there is no LOINC yet or at the granularity/specificity needed?

  • What about Lab Developed Tests (may be from performing lab-such as reference or public health lab, not vendor)

  • What about patient performed/home tests (home covid, pregnancy test, etc.)

  • Need to implement higher level terms, avoidance of many-to-many mapping.

Data aggregation

  • Aggregation using LOINC Axis

    • Allows laboratory data to be aggregated based on the component, property, timing, system, scale, and/or method

    • Does not require additional LIVD data elements to support

  • Method specific to “methodless” data aggregation

    • Identify the “methodless” LOINC code which may be used to aggregate data from method specific laboratory test / LOINC codes

      • Used when the method used to perform the laboratory test does not alter the clinical interpretation of the result

    • May require the addition of a data element to support an “Archetype” LOINC code in order to support a stated definition made by a LOINC author.

      • May be determine computationally negating the need for a data element.

  • LOINC Groups

    • Manually identified groups of LOINC codes for a specific purpose

      • Results from individual LOINC group components may or may not be allowed to be aggregated together

      • “Archetype” code typically assigned by LOINC author indicating that individual LOINC codes in the group may be aggregated.

    • May require additional LIVD data elements to support

  • Clinical aggregation

    • The LOINC Multi-axial hierarchy in addition to LOINC parts may be used to provide useful categorization for data aggregation to be used in the display of results on user interfaces

    • Example - Group all laboratory results that are Chemistry or Chemistry - challenge

      • LP29693-6 | Laboratory |

        • LP343631-0 | Chemistry and Chemistry - challenge

          • 2339-0 | Glucose [Mass/volume] in Blood

    • May or may not require data element(s) in the LIVD file to support if a standardized leaf-level is defined.

  • Custom data aggregation

    • Out-of-scope for this iteration of LIVD as no standardized data element(s) would be definable.

Standards Development Issues

  • Ensure the LOINC - SNOMED CT collaborative agreement and how to deal with differences in approaches

Format Considerations

  • Current format is spreadsheet for manual review and use

  • Future formats should

    • support automatic mapping, if possible (no reason why it would not be possible)

    • support mapping assistance for manual selection

    • be easily searchable

0 Comments

You are not logged in. Any changes you make will be marked as anonymous. You may want to Log In if you already have an account.