2026-02-19 LabMCoP Meeting Notes
Date
Feb 19, 2026
Attendees
Present | Name | Organization |
|---|---|---|
X | Nancy Cornish | CDC |
| Manjula Dharmawardhana | CDC |
X | Riki Merrick | APHL |
X | Christina Gallegos | APHL |
X | Amy Liu | Inductive Health / APHL |
| Raj Dash | Duke / CAP |
- | John Snyder | Pragmatic Terminologies, LLC |
X | Andrea Pitkus | UW |
| Kathy Walsh | Labcorp |
| Rob Hausam | Hausam Consulting |
| Pam Banning | 3M |
Upcoming OOO |
|
|
Follow up items |
|
|
Nancy Update |
| CDC is working on https://isp.healthit.gov/united-states-core-data-interoperability-uscdi#draft-uscdi-v7 Specimen Collection Date/Time: is covered by Performance Time under the Healthcare Information Attributes looking for use cases to support these othere elements - this was discussed 2026-01-20 LIDR Meeting Notes
|
Specimen CMT terms review | Christina | no new terms to review
|
Lab tests as procedures or orderables | not discussed Do we still need this? | Recommendation by SNOMED is that the Observable entity hierarchy be used for both ordering and resulting. As for the technique hierarchy, that in no way is intended to be used for either ordering or resulting laboratory tests. Those concepts are used to model both observables and procedures. SNOMED LOINC extension: SNOMED International Browser The problem is that major EHR-s vendors have set up CPOE using Procedures for orders to initiate a workflow (that creates the triggering event in the system) - that’s where the push-back comes from. There is a CPT to SNOMED CT mapping (as a paid mapping available from AMA), but no LOINC mapping. Can we reach out to CAP Informatics, ADLM Informatics and ASCLS Informatics to get their take on where Lab tests should live
We had said we would work through the Colonoscopy example: Reference links: clinical guidelines: Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology | ACG Quality Indicators: Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology | ACG
|
Specimen CMT - Hosting Options | not discusse |
|
European Semantic work | not discusse | Link to the German FHIR IG around suceptibility testing: Semantic Example section: Confluence page: Ask if Rob can keep us updated |
Specimen CMT pilot implementers | not discusse |
|
Specimen CMT - education | not discusse |
|
Specimen CMT - tracking implementation impact
| not discusse |
|
Future projects for this call after CMT | not discusse |
|
Recording:
Please contact riki.merrick@aphl.org for a copy
Chat:
Action items
Quick decisions not requiring context or tracking
For quick, smaller decisions that do not require extra context or formal tracking, use the “Add a decision…” function here.
Decisions requiring context or tracking
For decisions that require more context (e.g., documentation of discussion, options considered) and/or tracking, use the decision template to capture more information.