2026-05-07 LabMCoP Meeting Notes
Edit

2026-05-07 LabMCoP Meeting Notes

Date

May 7, 2026

Attendees

Present

Name

Organization

Present

Name

Organization

X

Nancy Cornish

CDC

X

Manjula Dharmawardhana

CDC

X

Riki Merrick

APHL

X

Christina Gallegos

APHL

X

Amy Liu

Inductive Health / APHL

-

Raj Dash

Duke / CAP

X

John Snyder

Pragmatic Terminologies, LLC

-

Andrea Pitkus

UW

X

Kathy Walsh

Labcorp

 

Rob Hausam

Hausam Consulting

 

Pam Banning

 3M

 

Elissa Passiment

 

 

Kristina Betz

CDC - NHSN

 

Diego Arambula

CDC

Upcoming OOO

 

  • Reminder: We are now using https://aphlinformatics.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/LMCOPL/calendars and everyone can just keep it updated

    NOTE: you will need to use type “Event” if you do not have a confluence account

  • Riki not available 5/21 and 5/28 - what do folks want to do with these dates - we will decide next week

Working with DHQP for NHSN reporting

Nancy

Follow up list:

  • Urine culture results for HAI - ask Kristi when we ask her to help us formulate the questions for SHIELD

  • goal is to set up the LOINC codes needed for collecting blood culture contamination data - future best practice - reached out to Xavier and working on an email that can be shared with Raj (for Duke and CAP for

Specimen CMT terms

Christina

only NHSN terms left for questions:

  • NHSN blood has different info from our blood term

  • cardiovascular sample - too broad - do not use

  • cartilage - our term already has everything NHSN term has, so no need to add

  • CervixCytologicalMateriallMaterial - should add, links are working; remove the SPM-7 entry by Andrea, this is not part of the current SPM-4 term definition in SCT browser

  • ChylousFluid - need that as PHLP PreferredName; should further define from where in the body this has been collected, so SPM-8 required, SPM-9 nice to have; micro-related - also chemical, partially defined; preferred; example for chemistry: https://ltd.aruplab.com/Tests/Pub/3005996

Call adjourned

 

11:59 AM EDT - below not discussed

Specimen CMT - Hosting Options

 

Any Updates on FU with:

Clinical Architecture:

ONC:

 

CMT Governance process

 

 

CMT proposed maintenance process

 

Start writing this up on this confluence page: Specimen CMT Update Process

Questions from Zulip thread that should be covered by the process we come up with here:

  1. Requests for terms used in practice that are not yet in the Cross Map Table?

  2. Requests for any corrections or needed updates to terms?

  3. What type of version control will be leveraged for releases and major/minor updates?

  4. How do you plan to incorporate SNOMED CT Release Updates into Cross Map updates/releases?

  5. At what frequency will updates occur? For example, will you process SCT updates once yearly and have a subsequent Cross Map release yearly with changes or more or less often?

  6. How do you communicate differential changes between releases? Is a differential file produced or is it expected that users will be able to find changes on their own?

  7. What type of customer support for downloads is expected? Will the release entity provide or is it expected of the site hosting the content for download? Both need to work colLABoratively to ensure no blockers arise for users/consumers.

User Guide starter Specimen Cross-Mapping-Table (Specimen CMT)

Follow up items

 

Lab tests as procedures or orderables

Do we still need this?

Recommendation by SNOMED is that the Observable entity hierarchy be used for both ordering and resulting. 

As for the technique hierarchy, that in no way is intended to be used for either ordering or resulting laboratory tests.  Those concepts are used to model both observables and procedures.  

SNOMED LOINC extension: https://browser.loincsnomed.org/?perspective=full&conceptId1=363787002&edition=MAIN/LOINC/2025-09-21&release=&languages=en

The problem is that major EHR-s vendors have set up CPOE using Procedures for orders to initiate a workflow (that creates the triggering event in the system) - that’s where the push-back comes from.

There is a CPT to SNOMED CT mapping (as a paid mapping available from AMA), but no LOINC mapping.

Can we reach out to CAP Informatics, ADLM Informatics and ASCLS Informatics to get their take on where Lab tests should live

We had said we would work through the Colonoscopy example:

Reference links:

clinical guidelines: Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology | ACG

Quality Indicators: Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology | ACG

  • For CAP cancer reporting is using SNOMED CT - would be good to look which they chose to represent the performed lab test

There is this question in the LOINC Community: https://forum.loinc.org/t/assistance-creating-a-value-set-for-all-loinc-procedure-concepts/2993

it is related to this US Core FHIR Change request: https://jira.hl7.org/browse/FHIR-54415

Answer to this one is that in USCDI Procedure (https://isp.healthit.gov/taxonomy/term/781/uscdi-v6) does not list LOINC as applicable Vocab standard in any verion, so remove it.

Often folks think of lab tests as procedures, because they can be ordered in CPOE (and outsidde the US, in the UK for example that’s how folks have modeled those, which is why LOINC was adding more of the high level order codes in 2.81 release, so we still should tackle the LOINC community question.

John was working on creatign an intesnional valueset definition based on class + type and maybe a few other attributes

European Semantic work

 

Link to the German FHIR IG around suceptibility testing:

https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsimplifier.net%2Fguide%2Fars-implementation-guide%3Fversion%3Dcurrent&data=05%7C02%7Criki.merrick%40aphl.org%7Ce11e8daf7f2d4827d07808ddcac8861c%7C434e0aedef824568a0493b17adc08ddd%7C1%7C0%7C638889684844672822%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=kZJRoBl2tMQzWQoYVkaRnEUaaBxepA9sAIu1myDQMyo%3D&reserved=0

Semantic Example section: https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsimplifier.net%2Fguide%2FARS-Implementation-Guide%2FHome%2FSemantics%3Fversion%3Dcurrent&data=05%7C02%7Criki.merrick%40aphl.org%7Ce11e8daf7f2d4827d07808ddcac8861c%7C434e0aedef824568a0493b17adc08ddd%7C1%7C0%7C638889684844702198%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qQH%2Ff5xwG0O8DvNE4rbjZineXBhY%2BiOWmN047DRthNQ%3D&reserved=0

Confluence page:

Ask if Rob can keep us updated

Specimen CMT pilot implementers

 

Specimen CMT - education

 

  • Need education for providers and IT folks that helps with set up of the EHR-S / LIS configuration -this can be supported / accomplished? with the Implementaiton Guide we could write

  • if we have a use case of how a patient is impacted on their journey through the healthcare system - CAP created a nice video that showed how patient care was affected by incorrect data https://infobeta.cap.org/shield/

Specimen CMT - tracking implementation impact

  • Setting baseline

  • Define metrics

 

 

Future projects for this call after CMT

 

  • In general the call is intended as a forum for ANY messaging related issues to work out.

  • In the past we have

    • reviewed containers re-vive that - and how does that interact with devices (UDI identification?)

    • review code systems around additives (HL70371 and SCT substance and product hierarchies)

    • started work on cross-mapping between HL7 method codes and SNOMED CT procedure / technique concepts

      • American College of Surgeons is working on procedure protocol and synoptic data elements / surgical synoptic reports - we could work with them together on that

    • Look at other HL7 tables that we would want to migrate SCT

Recording:

If you are interested in the recording, please email riki.merrick@aphl.org

Chat:

11:18:32 From John Snyder (NLM / US SNOMED NRC) : Sorry am running late today
11:27:29 From vgh5@cdc.gov : https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=37e133c07f07e1e60fc4ddf6c9f574f73892d4bf32f970618f6334693cd481abJmltdHM9MTc3ODExMjAwMA&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=4&fclid=35b4e9cb-f55f-6e99-3db1-fe99f4426f14&psq=CDC+and+Blood+culture+contamination+protocol&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuY2RjLmdvdi9sYWItcXVhbGl0eS9waHAvcHJldmVudC1hZHVsdC1ibG9vZC1jdWx0dXJlLWNvbnRhbWluYXRpb24vaW5kZXguaHRtbA
11:28:16 From vgh5@cdc.gov : Prevent Adult Blood Culture Contamination | Laboratory Quality | CDC
11:50:30 From sage.zoom@aphl.org : https://ltd.aruplab.com/Tests/Pub/3005996

 

Action items

Quick decisions not requiring context or tracking

For quick, smaller decisions that do not require extra context or formal tracking, use the “Add a decision…” function here.

Decisions requiring context or tracking

For decisions that require more context (e.g., documentation of discussion, options considered) and/or tracking, use the decision template to capture more information.