Date
May 21, 2025
Attendees
(bolded names indicate attendance)
Stakeholder group | SHIELD organization | Name of SHIELD member | organization designation |
Industry Entity | Labgnostic, Inc. | Steve Box | primary |
|
| alternate | |
Epic | Dan Rutz | primary | |
|
| alternate | |
Biomerieux | Xavier Gansel | primary | |
|
| alternate | |
Roche | Nick Decker | primary | |
Roche | Yue Jin | alternate | |
Healthcare Provider | Indiana University/Indiana University Health/Association for Molecular Pathology | Mehdi Nassiri, MD | primary |
University of Wisconsin-Madison | Andrea Pitkus, PhD, MLS(ASCP)CM, FAMIA | primary | |
UT Southwestern Medical Center | Hung Luu | primary | |
UNMC | Scott Campbell | primary | |
Longtime Lab Professional | Carmen Pugh | primary | |
Sonic Healthcare | Eric Crugnale | primary | |
Former Quest Diagnostics | Collom, Craig D | primary | |
Patient Advocate | OPEN | OPEN | individual |
Standards Organization | SNOMED International
| Jim Case | primary |
Monica Harry | alternate | ||
Regenstrief Institute
| Marjorie Rallins | primary | |
Eza Hafeza | alternate | ||
HL7
| Julia Skapik | primary | |
| alternate | ||
Professional Organization | Association of Public Health Laboratories
| Riki Merrick- regrets | primary |
Christina Gallegos | alternate | ||
Graphite Health
| Stan Huff | primary | |
| alternate | ||
CAP
| Raj Dash | primary | |
| alternate | ||
AMP
| Robyn Temple | primary | |
| alternate | ||
Governmental - non Voting | CMS | Michael Smalara | primary |
Open | alternate | ||
ASTP/ONC | Sara Armson | primary | |
| alternate | ||
CDC | Hubert Vesper (/DDNID/NCEH/DLS) | primary | |
Jasmine Chaitram | alternate | ||
NLM | John Snyder | primary | |
| alternate | ||
FDA | Keith Campbell | primary | |
Victoria Derbyshire | alternate |
Agenda and Notes
Item | Notes |
|---|---|
Quorum evaluation (two-thirds (2/3) of the Voting Representatives shall be necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business) | Currently we have 17 named members (2 open slots), so 2/3 = 11 is quorum (excluding chair and government members). # of voting member per charter: 13 - 21 # of non-voting members per charter: 7
|
Open Meeting | 1: 08 PM ET no quorum |
Conferences/Time critical things | AMIA November 15 - 19 in Atlanta, GA https://amia.org/education-events/amia-2025-annual-symposium/call-participation submitted proposal - no update ASCLS presentation is scheduled for June 11, 2025, 8 - 9 AM PT - slides due to ASCLS on May 16th - Thanks to those who provided feedback and evotes.
ADLM reached out to request a webinar about SHIELD later this year To Be Scheduled
|
SHIELD Comments not submitted as deadline was missed. New RFI on May 16, 2025 provides opportunity to comment on informatics items including USCDI.
Comments due 6/16/25. Is this of interest to SHIELD? Discussion:
| |
SHIELD Charter Updates - Next time | Proposed Charter Updates To Article Three - March 2025 - Review the updated Article Three of the Charter as a whole Discuss:
Note: Changes to the Charter require unanimous approval by the Steering Committee |
LIDR White Paper Review and Vote - Next time | Discuss: See LIDR White Paper. Discussion and resolution of comments. Several unresolved comments remain. |
Roadmap section updates in response to ONC comments on the SHIELD roadmap - Next time | Reviewing Updated Roadmap: https://aphlinformatics.atlassian.net/wiki/download/attachments/3214147628/DRAFT_UpdatedSHIELD_Community Roadmap_20250402.docx?api=v2 Changes are highlighted with markup Addressing these ONC comments:
Identify components that could improve the ecosystem infrastructure, and then highlight the places where these components can be advanced / sustained or made easier to implement. Would SHIELD be willing to consider to provide an example implementation - create the structures and bound terminologies to showcase how each element would be properly represented be working. For each of the Consideration sections we could certainly add a section on feasibility / requirements (e.g. continued funding for LIDR, better describing the intended use of ANY data element added, overall goal of LIDR, clearly delineate what is commonly used and is minimum, provide best practice and alternatives (non-preferred) - example would be metadata around the value sets in VSAC (curation / usage etc) to be able to ascertain quality) and highlight that other mechanisms are needed to achieve for adoption. Discussion: |
Review Working Groups progress -Next time | THANK YOU to all the WG Chairs for their effort in moving SHIELD work forward!!! Setting milestones for deliverables should be NEXT for WGs: they will be captured here: SHIELD WG Deliverables and Milestone Grid
|
Placeholder to get back to later - Next time |
|
Next calls - Next time | All SHIELD Calls
General Updates: 2024 - WG Chairs please make sure we have material for updates (at least notes we can link to) Special Topic:
Steering Committee:
|
Adjourned | 1: 57 PM ET |
From Chat:
Can’t currently copy out of chat
Action items
Quick decisions not requiring context or tracking
For quick, smaller decisions that do not require extra context or formal tracking, use the “Add a decision…” function here.
Decisions requiring context or tracking
For decisions that require more context (e.g., documentation of discussion, options considered) and/or tracking, use the decision template to capture more information.