Date
Jul 16, 2025
Attendees
(bolded names indicate attendance)
Stakeholder group | SHIELD organization | Name of SHIELD member | organization designation |
Industry Entity | Labgnostic, Inc. | Steve Box | primary |
|
| alternate | |
Epic | Dan Rutz | primary | |
|
| alternate | |
Biomerieux | Xavier Gansel | primary | |
|
| alternate | |
Roche | Nick Decker | primary | |
Roche | Open | alternate | |
Healthcare Provider | Indiana University/Indiana University Health/Association for Molecular Pathology | Mehdi Nassiri, MD | primary |
University of Wisconsin-Madison | Andrea Pitkus, PhD, MLS(ASCP)CM, FAMIA | primary | |
UT Southwestern Medical Center | Hung Luu - regrets | primary | |
UNMC | Scott Campbell | primary | |
Longtime Lab Professional | Carmen Pugh | primary | |
Sonic Healthcare | Eric Crugnale | primary | |
Former Quest Diagnostics | Collom, Craig D | primary | |
Patient Advocate | OPEN | OPEN | individual |
Standards Organization | SNOMED International
| Jim Case | primary |
Monica Harry | alternate | ||
Regenstrief Institute
| Marjorie Rallins | primary | |
Eza Hafeza | alternate | ||
HL7
| Julia Skapik- regrets | primary | |
| alternate | ||
Professional Organization | Association of Public Health Laboratories
| Riki Merrick- regrets | primary |
Christina Gallegos - regrets | alternate | ||
Logica
| Stan Huff - regrets | primary | |
| alternate | ||
CAP
| Raj Dash | primary | |
| alternate | ||
AMP
| Robyn Temple | primary | |
| alternate | ||
Governmental - non Voting | CMS | Michael Smalara | primary |
Open | alternate | ||
ASTP/ONC | Sara Armson | primary | |
| alternate | ||
CDC | Hubert Vesper (/DDNID/NCEH/DLS) | primary | |
Jasmine Chaitram | alternate | ||
NLM | John Snyder | primary | |
Raja Cholan | alternate (checking) | ||
FDA | Keith Campbell | primary | |
Victoria Derbyshire | alternate |
Agenda and Notes
Item | Notes |
|---|---|
Quorum evaluation (two-thirds (2/3) of the Voting Representatives shall be necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business) | Currently we have 17 named members (2 open slots), so 2/3 = 11 is quorum (excluding chair and government members). # of voting member per charter: 13 - 21 # of non-voting members per charter: 7
|
Open Meeting | 12:08 PM ET |
Conferences/Time critical things / FYI | AMIA November 15 - 19 in Atlanta, GA https://amia.org/education-events/amia-2025-annual-symposium/call-participation was accepted ADLM webinar about SHIELD is scheduled for October 22, 2025 12 - 1 PM ET |
SHIELD Charter Updates | https://aphlinformatics.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/SC/pages/3071279178 - Missing votes from 4 members, 2 of whom are still OOO, so will wait a bit longer and do another follow up email before the August meeting. Note: Changes to the Charter require unanimous approval by the Steering Committee!! Next Steps: Review SC participation (As of now need to still add the dates the Votes went out) and put this on the ALL SHIELD call |
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-LM-25-002.html | Was due by Jul 14, 2025, but unfortunately we only got 7 responses, so we did NOT submit this |
https://aphlinformatics.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/SC/pages/2020966449 | Riki still has to send out the email to request a vote (didn't want to overlap with the NLM feedback and charter eVote so have not sent out yet) Didn’t have quorum on the call, but recorded votes from those on the call. |
Standards WG Vocab Follow up | https://aphlinformatics.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/SC/pages/3347447812 Please review and provide comments - aim for August See https://aphlinformatics.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/SC/pages/3347447812 for discussion items from today’s Steering Committee on the 15 Open Items/Items for Potential Action (especially #1 and 15). Great discussio10 |
Roadmap section updates in response to ONC comments on the SHIELD roadmap | Reviewing Updated Roadmap: https://aphlinformatics.atlassian.net/wiki/download/attachments/3214147628/DRAFT_UpdatedSHIELD_Community Roadmap_20250402.docx?api=v2 Changes are highlighted with markup addressing these ONC comments:
Identify components that could improve the ecosystem infrastructure, and then highlight the places where these components can be advanced / sustained or made easier to implement. Would SHIELD be willing to consider to provide an example implementation - create the structures and bound terminologies to showcase how each element would be properly represented be working. (Action plan of which solutions would improve intereoperability. Why were these solutions chosen for the path forward. What is needed? How do you know this is the right path forward? Where’s the evidence this will work? ) For each of the Consideration sections we could certainly add a section on feasibility / requirements (e.g. continued funding for LIDR, better describing the intended use of ANY data element added, overall goal of LIDR, clearly delineate what is commonly used and is minimum, provide best practice and alternatives (non-preferred) - example would be metadata around the value sets in VSAC (curation / usage etc) to be able to ascertain quality) and highlight that other mechanisms are needed to achieve for adoption. Discuss: |
Review Working Groups progress | THANK YOU to all the WG Chairs for their effort in moving SHIELD work forward!!! Setting milestones for deliverables should be NEXT for WGs: they will be captured here: SHIELD WG Deliverables and Milestone Grid
|
Placeholder to get back to later - NEXT TIME |
|
Next calls
| All SHIELD Calls
General Updates: 2024 - WG Chairs please make sure we have material for updates (at least notes we can link to) Special Topic:
Steering Committee:
|
Adjourned | 1:01 PM ET |
From Chat:
Action items
Quick decisions not requiring context or tracking
For quick, smaller decisions that do not require extra context or formal tracking, use the “Add a decision…” function here.
Decisions requiring context or tracking
For decisions that require more context (e.g., documentation of discussion, options considered) and/or tracking, use the decision template to capture more information.