Date

Apr 18, 2023

Attendees (bolded = present)

Stakeholder group

SHIELD organization

Name of SHIELD member

organization designation

Industry Entity

Labgnostic, Inc.

Aaron Green

primary

 

 

alternate

Epic

Dan Rutz

primary

 

 

alternate

Biomerieux

Xavier Gansel

primary

 

 

alternate

Roche

Nick Decker

primary

 

 

alternate

Healthcare Provider

Indiana University/Indiana University Health/Association for Molecular Pathology

Mehdi Nassiri, MD

primary

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Andrea Pitkus, PhD, MLS(ASCP)CM, FAMIA

primary

UT Southwestern Medical Center

Hung Luu

primary

UNMC

Scott Campbell

primary

Tufts Medical Center

Nanguneri Nirmala

primary

Sonic Healthcare

Eric Crugnale

primary

Quest Diagnostics

Collom, Craig D

primary

Standards Organization

SNOMED International

 

James T. Case

primary

 Monica Harry

alternate

Regenstrief Institute

 

Marjorie Rallins

primary

Eza Hafeza

alternate

HL7

 

Julia Skapik

primary

 

alternate

Professional Organization

Association of Public Health Laboratories

 

Riki Merrick

primary

 Dari Shirazi

alternate

Graphite Health

 

Stan Huff

primary

 

alternate

CAP

 

Raj Dash

primary

 

alternate

AMP

 

Robyn Temple

primary

 

alternate

Governmental - non Voting

CMS

CMS

Serafina Brea

primary


alternate

ONC

ONC

Sara Armson

primary


alternate

CDC

CDC

Hubert Vesper (/DDNID/NCEH/DLS)

primary

Jasmine Chaitram

alternate

NLM


primary


alternate

FDA

FDA


primary


alternate

Agenda and Notes

Agenda Item

Notes

Quorum evalution (two-thirds (2/3) of the Voting Representatives shall be necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business)

Currently we have 18 named members, so 2/3 = 12

Open Meeting

12:03 PM EDT

Approve Roadmap https://aphlinformatics.atlassian.net/wiki/download/attachments/1107099656/DRAFT_SHIELD_Community Roadmap_02.08_CLEAN.docx?api=v2

Had a call last week to familiarize newer SC members with the roadmap document which resulted in some suggested changes -Document changes were reviewed - the changes bring this document up to date and improve readability, but are not substantive.

Version at end of this call - with track changes and comments for discussion retained: https://aphlinformatics.atlassian.net/wiki/download/attachments/1877147663/DRAFT_SHIELD_Community Roadmap_04.18.23_MarkUp.docx?api=v2

HOMEWORK: please re-review the marked up document and we will vote on our next call.

Review Working Group Committee list and establish SC representation

https://aphlinformatics.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/SC/pages/1887437089

HOMEWORK - please review the confluence page - add rows for new projects / working groups / rename working groups / pick any Working group project you would like to lead

  • Logistics support for WG

  • Prioritize for the next 6 months

  • set specific goals - short term and long term

Charter updates: Draft non-participation clause for SC

NOT DISCUSSED

Any volunteers?

Logistics of publishing community approved work products

NOT DISCUSSED

Document decision workflow (e.g. WG product - ALL SHIELD review and comment - comment resolution in WG - Steering Committee approval - work product publication)

NOT DISCUSSED

Review project proposal template

Brief into to the proposal: https://aphlinformatics.atlassian.net/wiki/download/attachments/1877147663/Shield Initiative Report Template 28Mar23.docx?api=v2

Please review and provide feedback

goal is to collect work item ideas and be abel to prioritize them for Workgroups

Next call

May 2, 2023 12 -1 PM EDT

Adjourned

1:01 PM EDT

Future Agenda Items:

  • Review specific template for result value harmonization

  • Document decision workflow

  • Logistics of publishing community approved work products

  • Charter updates: Draft non-participation clause for SC


For recording access (SC members only) reach out to Riki

Action items



Quick decisions not requiring context or tracking

For quick, smaller decisions that do not require extra context or formal tracking, use the “Add a decision…” function here.



Decisions requiring context or tracking

For decisions that require more context (e.g., documentation of discussion, options considered) and/or tracking, use the decision template to capture more information.

Create from Template