Date
Jun 4, 2024
Attendees
(bolded names indicate attendance)
Stakeholder group | SHIELD organization | Name of SHIELD member | organization designation |
Industry Entity | Labgnostic, Inc. | Steve Box | primary |
| Andy Harris | alternate | |
Epic | Dan Rutz | primary | |
|
| alternate | |
Biomerieux | Xavier Gansel | primary | |
|
| alternate | |
Roche | Nick Decker | primary | |
Roche | Yue Jin | alternate | |
Healthcare Provider | Indiana University/Indiana University Health/Association for Molecular Pathology | Mehdi Nassiri, MD | primary |
University of Wisconsin-Madison | Andrea Pitkus, PhD, MLS(ASCP)CM, FAMIA | primary | |
UT Southwestern Medical Center | Hung Luu | primary | |
UNMC | Scott Campbell | primary | |
Tufts Medical Center | Nanguneri Nirmala | primary | |
Sonic Healthcare | Eric Crugnale | primary | |
Former Quest Diagnostics | Collom, Craig D | primary | |
Patient Advocate |
| Stacy Lange | individual |
Standards Organization | SNOMED International
| James T. Case | primary |
Monica Harry | alternate | ||
Regenstrief Institute
| Marjorie Rallins | primary | |
Eza Hafeza - regrets | alternate | ||
HL7
| Julia Skapik | primary | |
| alternate | ||
Professional Organization | Association of Public Health Laboratories
| Riki Merrick - regrets | primary |
Dari Shirazi | alternate | ||
Graphite Health
| Stan Huff | primary | |
| alternate | ||
CAP
| Raj Dash - regrets | primary | |
| alternate | ||
AMP
| Robyn Temple | primary | |
| alternate | ||
Governmental - non Voting | CMS | Michael Smalara | primary |
Open | alternate | ||
ONC | Sara Armson | primary | |
| alternate | ||
CDC | Hubert Vesper (/DDNID/NCEH/DLS) | primary | |
Jasmine Chaitram | alternate | ||
NLM | John Snyder | primary | |
| alternate | ||
FDA | Keith Campbell | primary | |
Victoria Derbyshire | alternate |
Agenda and Notes
Item | Notes | |
---|---|---|
Quorum evaluation (two-thirds (2/3) of the Voting Representatives shall be necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business) | Currently we have 19 named members, so 2/3 = 12 (excluding chair and government members).
| 12:08EST Welcome to Michael Smalara as CMS representative |
Open Meeting | ||
HIMSS Proposal
| Discussion on who will be attending and who to pull into a panel about SHIELD. Government agencies also have clearance. ONC will have multiple folks and will need clearance to participate. 2 or 3 people presentators. Julia Skapik, Eric Crugnale, ONC person. 1 hour. Eric and Julia to connect and have a draft proposal. Aim by end of day Wed. Andrea will share slides from LOINC with Eric, Julia, Sara? Title/Focus: End to End lab interoperability. educational and future. public private partnership. applied focus. data Warehouse examples Julia. ONC USCDI data items. IMO/Clinical Architecture, who act as surrogate. Plan to send by Fri for E-Vote due by Monday for submission by June 10th deadline. | |
Follow up Items - |
| |
Review Working Groups progress | Setting milestones for deliverables should be NEXT for WGs: they will be captured here: SHIELD WG Deliverables and Milestone Grid
| |
ONC Feedback |
| |
Roadmap section updates in response to ONC comments on the SHIELD roadmap - NOT DISCUSSED |
From last SC call: Nick will connect with Sara to get more context and then bring this to the IVD datahub group - then Nick will bring back here Emoji :slight_smile:
Update from Standards and Vocab WG about re-write of this section?
Identify components that could improve the ecosystem infrastructure, and then highlight the places where these components can be advanced / sustained or made easier to implement. Would SHIELD be willing to consider to provide an exampel implementation - create the structures and bound terminologies to showcase how each element would be properly represented be working. Looking for volunteer to tackle this re-write: For each of the Consideration sections we could certainly add a section on feasibility / requirements (e.g. continued funding for LIDR, better describing the intended use of ANY data element added, overall goal of LIDR, clearly delineate what is commonly used and is minimum, provide best practice and alternatives (non-preferred) - example would be metadata around the value sets in VSAC (curation / usage etc) to be able to ascertain quality) and highlight that other mechanisms are needed to achieve for adoption. | |
Antimicrobial result reporting - NOT DISCUSSED | Placeholder to get back to later Related work at HL7 Europe: | |
Next calls - NOT DISCUSSED | All SHIELD: General Updates: June 25, 2024 Ask about SC: June 18, 2024 July 4th week call availability. July 2nd SC: iffy attendance. Hung around. Jim Case out. | |
Adjourned | 12:44: PM ET |
From Chat:
Action items
Quick decisions not requiring context or tracking
For quick, smaller decisions that do not require extra context or formal tracking, use the “Add a decision…” function here.
Decisions requiring context or tracking
For decisions that require more context (e.g., documentation of discussion, options considered) and/or tracking, use the decision template to capture more information.