Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

Attendees

Name

Organization

Role

Present?

 Andrea Pitkus

 University of Wisconsin-Madison

 Steering Committee member

No

 Eric Crugnale

 Sonic Healthcare USA

 Steering Committee member

Yes

Nanguneri Nirmala

 Tufts University

Steering Committee member

Yes

Stacy Lange

Patient Advocate

Steering Committee member

No

Kevin Schap

CAP

All SHIELD

No

Discussion topics

  • Meeting with Nick Decker (Roche Diagnostics and IVD Data Hub Workgroup Chair)

    • How can we drive more engagement in IVD Data Hub Working Group?

    • What is value of IVD Data Hub?

      • IVD Vendors would benefit from IVD Data Hub

      • Do stakeholders see value in adoption of technical standards?

    • IVD Data Hub is a demonstration of the value of SHIELD, so is is more of a secondary goal that is enabled by adoption of technical standards for lab result data exchange?

  • Discuss ways to support other Workgroups

    • Attract/retain contributors

    • Publicize goals and accomplishments

    • Identify value propositions as well as challenges/concerns for stakeholders

    • We need to articulate the value proposition for each industry group

    • Ideally the CAP article will be able to address this.

    • Should the Branding and Communications WG put out a survey, or interview members to understand the goals and concerns of the stakeholders:

      • Combination of canned questions and open dialog

    • Start a page to list questions on another page

      • Why are you supporting SHIELD?

      • What are your concerns?

        • Unfunded mandates?

        • Cost of implementation?

        • Complexity?

        • ROI?

        • Need?

      • What would be the primary values of SHIELD success?

      • What would be your primary challenges to adopting SHIELD related standards?

      • What are your primary challenges in your current working group?

      • What would you like to accomplish in the next 12 months?

      • What expertise is most beneficial for workgroup participation?

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes





Action items

  •  

Quick decisions not requiring context or tracking

For quick, smaller decisions that do not require extra context or formal tracking, use the “Add a decision…” function here.

    Decisions requiring context or tracking

    For decisions that require more context (e.g., documentation of discussion, options considered) and/or tracking, use the decision template to capture more information.

    Create from Template
    spaceKeyCLP
    blueprintModuleCompleteKeycom.atlassian.confluence.plugins.confluence-business-blueprints:decisions-blueprint
    contentBlueprintId7df0012f-f16f-4314-9440-69be210d9c3c
    templateName7df0012f-f16f-4314-9440-69be210d9c3c
    buttonLabelCreate decision from decision template