...
Agenda | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Presenter/Facilitator | Topic | Question(s)/Comments | ||||
Tim Longo | Quest IFD - Implementation Status Update
| Tim L.-Update-They are still working to finish the last nonstandard Quest Labs to the Aims platform. They set a date to the end of June to get all of the jurisdictions onboarded. This has been extended currently but will need to be completed as soon as possible. They are currently halfway complete with all of the jurisdictions being completed. 27 jurisdictions are in production and 24 (low to zero volume states) are currently in validation and review (Map is included in the slide deck and recording of this call). Quest is sunsetting all projects on the AIMS dashboard. Hilda M. (LA DPOH)-still seeing tests that are undefined with LOINC Codes etc. -1. MSH-5 and MSH-6 fields-Will these be hardcoded for each state uniquely. Per Tim L., yes and this is the main component that they are working to correct. This should be fixed by the end of this week (6/28) and should apply to your specific jurisdiction.
Tim will inquire and provide an update to Hilda at @Hilda.Madere@la.gov Karla-Follow-up with Tim offline to discuss production question. This will be our last Quest implementation project! | ||||
Kim Brown | Proposed solution for missing PID-7 in Quest messages (rare) | Thank you to everyone who answered the polls. The Pit 7’s, the majority of feedbac feedback they received from the polls, most states advised that they were accepting of receiving a message that was incomplete. Very few states advised that they would not like to receive those (any of these states, please contact Brooke B., Tim L., or Kim B. to provide details if needed). The proposal that they are suggesting is not to send anything over blank because most states advised that it is better with something in place. Please don’t place “fake dates” and just place all zero’s if this information is missing. They are seeking to have these changes implemented by the end of the summer. Autumn Ward, KY DPH-KY (NBS state) would be interested in testing this in our lower environment. I know we have issues with MCI and invalid DOBs in NEDSS. Per Kim-She will work with the KY team offline to review a POA. NC advised that this would be a challenge because their surveillance system uses the name DOB and other pieces to match. Per Kim B., she and her team will contact NC to review a plan of action. Jason-RI has a similar challenge as NC and Kim B. will need to work offline with them as well. | ||||
Brooke Beaulieu | Open Mic: Any questions or discussion topics?
| No additional topics this week. |