Date
Attendees
Name | Organization | Role | Present? |
|---|---|---|---|
Andrea Pitkus | University of Wisconsin-Madison | Steering Committee member | No |
Eric Crugnale | Sonic Healthcare USA | Steering Committee member | Yes |
Nanguneri Nirmala | Tufts University | Steering Committee member | Yes |
Stacy Lange | Patient Advocate | Steering Committee member | No |
Kevin Schap | CAP | All SHIELD | No |
Discussion topics
Meeting with Nick Decker (Roche Diagnostics and IVD Data Hub Workgroup Chair)
How can we drive more engagement in IVD Data Hub Working Group?
What is value of IVD Data Hub?
IVD Vendors would benefit from IVD Data Hub
Do stakeholders see value in adoption of technical standards?
IVD Data Hub is a demonstration of the value of SHIELD, so is is more of a secondary goal that is enabled by adoption of technical standards for lab result data exchange?
Discuss ways to support other Workgroups
Attract/retain contributors
Publicize goals and accomplishments
Identify value propositions as well as challenges/concerns for stakeholders
We need to articulate the value proposition for each industry group
Ideally the CAP article will be able to address this.
Should the Branding and Communications WG put out a survey, or interview members to understand the goals and concerns of the stakeholders:
Combination of canned questions and open dialog
Start a page to list questions on another page
Time | Item | Presenter | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
Action items
Quick decisions not requiring context or tracking
For quick, smaller decisions that do not require extra context or formal tracking, use the “Add a decision…” function here.
Decisions requiring context or tracking
For decisions that require more context (e.g., documentation of discussion, options considered) and/or tracking, use the decision template to capture more information.
Add Comment