Date
Attendees
Present | Name | Organization |
---|---|---|
Nancy Cornish | CDC | |
Manjula Gama-Ralalage | CDC | |
regrets | Riki Merrick | APHL |
Christina Gallegos | APHL | |
Amy Liu | Inductive Health / APHL | |
Raj Dash | Duke / CAP | |
John Snyder | National Library of Medicine (SNOMED CT) | |
Andrea Pitkus | UW | |
Kathy Walsh | Labcorp | |
Rob Hausam | Hausam Consulting | |
| Doug York | APHL |
| Pam Banning | 3M |
| Sandy Jones | CDC |
Discussion topics
Upcoming OOO |
|
|
Speicmen CMT presentation for SHIELD | Presentation on September 10, 2024 went welll - here is the link to the recording: 2024-09-10 SHIELD Topic#2 Call Meeting Notes | |
HL7 FHIR Profile: Skin and Wound Assessment, Release 1 (For Comment) | Background in the Proposal: Skin and Wound Assessment - FHIR - Confluence (hl7.org) There was a vendor that created a FHIR App that apparently is used. While not specific about pathology there was much discussion on how to document "landmarks" on the body like moles, tattoos, etc in relation to wound location. Conceivably, if a wound culture was performed, the specimen source site info would overlap with wound details. Pathology specimens would have similar needs. There are various refsets, value sets and SCT extensions listed. It was mentioned it should align with laboratory and pathology specimen information, but I haven't reviewed the codes/terms. Not sure if anything they developed would fill any CMT gaps or already contained therein? Mitre did a lot of the work on this too. Discussion: | |
specimen condition and reject reason work | Here is the confluence page where OO is tracking this project: https://confluence.hl7.org/display/OO/Specimen+Condition+and+Specimen+Reject+Reason+Vocabulary Next step is to review against the concepts in #1 Standard PREanalytical Code Version 4.0 - (version 3.0 is here: https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.isber.org/resource/resmgr/isber_2019/pdf/standard_preanalytical_code_.pdf) maybe consider using this (if so, HL7 would need joint copyright or something) and also #2 international standard for biobanking: the ISO 20387:2018 - is anyone member and has access?
#3 ISBER BP5 for information regarding 'Specimen Reject Reason' | |
Previous Action Items |
|
|
Specimen CMT - review of terms with questions |
| |
Specimen CMT pilot implementers |
|
|
Specimen CMT - Hosting Options |
|
|
Specimen CMT - education |
|
|
Specimen CMT - tracking implementation impact
|
|
|
Specimen CMT - Compare to NHS Medical Terminology testing |
|
|
LOINC to SNOMED CT mapping |
|
|
Future projects for this call after CMT |
|
|
Recording:
Action items
Quick decisions not requiring context or tracking
For quick, smaller decisions that do not require extra context or formal tracking, use the “Add a decision…” function here.
Decisions requiring context or tracking
For decisions that require more context (e.g., documentation of discussion, options considered) and/or tracking, use the decision template to capture more information.
0 Comments