1Technical Considerations
Note that page is still in development. The preliminary sharing of this information is intended to benefit the ETOR initial implementers in preparation for their implementations, with the understanding that some information may change as our development evolves.
The following tables outline the technical considerations for public health laboratories (PHLs) and healthcare organizations (HCOs) implementing ETOR exchange via the APHL Intermediary.
Public Health Laboratories (PHLs) - Technical Considerations
Technical Component | Considerations | Notes |
---|---|---|
Transport Method Options |
| While the AIMS ETOR Intermediary can support other transport methods, S3 and SFTP are preferred given functionality, resiliency, and versatility. |
Network/Firewall Requirements |
| Network/firewall components are directly linked to PHL transport methods. |
Message Payload Options |
| Any of the outlined file formats are compatible with the ETOR intermediary solution as long as the LIMS 1) is capable of importing sufficient order information and 2) contains fields for the data elements necessary to create a result. |
Data Field Recommendations | The recommended data fields for the in-scope test(s) will be defined during Gap Analysis discussions with both the PHL and HCO. | This allows for the creation of orders and results in the LIMS. |
LIMS Capability Requirements |
| Additional LIMS configurations may be necessary. If so, APHL will collaborate with the PHL to assist in communicating needs to the LIMS vendor. |
Integration Engine | No integration engine required for message transformations. | APHL does not recommend the use of an integration engine for transformation of data for ETOR exchange. Note: No integration engine should be needed if the LIMS can import/export data. If the LIMS cannot import/export data, APHL will work with the LIMS vendor to communicate updates needed. |
Healthcare Organizations (HCOs) - Technical Considerations
Technical Component | Considerations | Notes |
---|---|---|
Transport Method Options |
| While the AIMS ETOR Intermediary can support other transport methods, RESTful, FHIR and MLLP / VPN are preferred given functionality, resiliency, and versatility. |
Network/Firewall Requirements |
| Network/firewall components are directly linked to HCO transport methods. |
Message Payload Options |
| Any of the outlined file formats are compatible with the ETOR intermediary solution as long as the EHR 1) contains fields for the data elements necessary to create an order and 2) is capable of importing sufficient result information. |
Data Field Recommendations | The recommended data fields for the in-scope test(s) will be defined during Gap Analysis discussions with both the PHL and HCO. | This allows for the creation of orders and consumption of results in the EHR. |
EHR Capability Requirements |
| Â |
Â