/
2025-01-27 Steering Committee Meeting Notes

2025-01-27 Steering Committee Meeting Notes

Date

Jan 27, 2025

Attendees

(bolded names indicate attendance)

Stakeholder group

SHIELD organization

Name of SHIELD member

organization designation

Industry Entity

Labgnostic, Inc. - OPEN?

Steve Box

primary

 

NEED NEW

alternate

Epic

Dan Rutz

primary

 

 

alternate

Biomerieux

Xavier Gansel

 primary

 

 

alternate

Roche

Nick Decker - regrets

primary

Roche

Yue Jin

alternate

Healthcare Provider

Indiana University/Indiana University Health/Association for Molecular Pathology

Mehdi Nassiri, MD

primary

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Andrea Pitkus, PhD, MLS(ASCP)CM, FAMIA

primary

UT Southwestern Medical Center

Hung Luu

primary

UNMC

Scott Campbell

primary

OPEN

OPEN

primary

Sonic Healthcare

Eric Crugnale

primary

Former Quest Diagnostics - OPEN?

Collom, Craig D

primary

Patient Advocate

 OPEN?

Stacy Lange

individual

Standards Organization

SNOMED International

 

Jim Case

primary

Monica Harry

alternate

Regenstrief Institute

 

Marjorie Rallins

primary

Eza Hafeza

alternate

HL7

 

Julia Skapik

primary

 

alternate

Professional Organization

Association of Public Health Laboratories

 

Riki Merrick

primary

Christina Gallegos

alternate

Graphite Health

 

Stan Huff

primary

 

alternate

CAP

 

Raj Dash

primary

 

alternate

AMP

 

Robyn Temple

primary

 

alternate

Governmental - non Voting

CMS

Michael Smalara - regrets

primary

Open

alternate

ASTP/ONC

Sara Armson - regrets

primary

 

alternate

CDC

Hubert Vesper - regrets (/DDNID/NCEH/DLS)

primary

Jasmine Chaitram

alternate

NLM

 John Snyder - regrets

primary

 

alternate

FDA

 Keith Campbell - regrets

primary

Victoria Derbyshire

alternate

Agenda and Notes

Item

Notes

Item

Notes

Quorum evaluation (two-thirds (2/3) of the Voting Representatives shall be necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business)

Currently we have 18 named members, so 2/3 = 12 (excluding chair and government members).

# of voting member per charter: 13 - 21

# of non-voting members per charter: 7

 

Open Meeting

 1:09 PM ET - no quorum

SHIELD Membership Requests

  • Steven Emrick from Purple Lab with a background in health terminology (he has expressed interest in co-leading the Standards and Vocab Working group (with some help also from Julia Skapik, when Raj steps down)

  • Carmen Pugh former Labcorp and long time lab professional (as individual rather than a CDC representative)

  • Mark Ediger is former airforce surgeon general (as indivdual rather than representative from Deloitte)

  • Natalee Agassi as representative for Oracle Cerner

Also now have an offical Quest Diagnostics participant again = Matthew Allison

Steering Committee Membership and Officer Roles

  • These slots are potentially open:

    • 1 Vendor (Labgnostic has not been participating)

    • 2 Healthcare Provider (Nirmala resigned end of December, Craig has not been participating on calls, would have to consider vote to terminate his SC participation, if we want to add more than one) = Have interest from these folks:

      • Jeffrey Smith from Kaiser Permanente

      • Carmen Pugh as individual

      • Mark Ediger as indivudal

    • 1 Patient Advocate (Stacy also resigned via email for now)

  • Chair and Vice Chair terms

    • First of 2 allowed consecutive terms expires 3/14/2025

    • Nomination period expires 2/12/2025

    • Votes have to be held before expiration, so on 3/10/2025 call

    • Interest received from:

      • Nick Decker

      • Eric Crugnale

      • Riki Merrick

      • Andrea Pitkus

  • Composition of Steering Committee changes

    • Expand by 2 members ?

Conferences

AMIA November 15 - 19 in Atlanta, GA - proposals are open till 3/19 https://amia.org/education-events/amia-2025-annual-symposium/call-participation

LOINC 7-10 October in Montreal, Canada - proposals are open till 3/30 https://loinc.org/conference/montreal-2025/presentations/

ASCLS got accepted - waiting for exact date/time

ADLM got submitted - waiting for response

Notes from the FDA Collaborative Community Panel are here: FDA CDRH Collaborative Community Panel

Other presentations to folks at FDA?

  • Data Standards Review Committee of the FDA – work with Helena Sviglin

  • FDA Scientific Computing Board (SCB)

  • Compass group lab

Report of SHIELD achievements for 2024

4 active SHIELD Working Groups plus the Steering Committee

Total of 104 calls held in 2024 which include:

  • 14 ALL SHIELD Community calls

  • 9 Special Topic calls

  • 62 Working group calls (32 LIDR+7 standards+17 comms+6 IVD)

  • 19 Steering Committee calls

Presentations

  • SHIELD members at LOINC 2023 and API 2024;

  • FDA sponsored presentations at LOINC 2024, SNOMED CT 2024 and ASTP 2024

  • 2 presentation proposals submitted for 2025

Provided feedback on 2 federal regulation/initiatives in 2024: USCDI V5 and Proposed HTI-2 Rule

List of the speakers on the Special Topics calls in 2024:

  • Synensys and MIT - Report on Systems-theoretic Process Analysis of data Qulaity in the Lab Data Exchange space

  • Pam Banning (Solventum)- Naming Options for Lab Tests within the LOINC terminology

  • Karim Nashar (NHS)- State of Interoperability in the UK

  • Judith Gillis (Amsterdam University Medical Center) - Comparability of lab results - Experiences in the Netherlands

  • Nancy Cornish (CDC) - Specimen Cross-Mapping-Table

  • Dr. James Crawford (Northwell) - Real World Data on COVID-19

  • Scott Campbell (University of Nebraska) - SNOMED CT Encoded Cancer Synoptic Reports

  • Giorgio Cangioli - FHIR Lab Report Impelementaiton Guide from HL7 Europe

  • Charlie Harpe (Clinical Architecture) - LOINC Mapping Experiences

Several members of SHIELD are supporting HITECH and Sequoia Laboratory Data Interoperability Implementation Guide

5 articles referencing SHIELD work, which are linked to from our website SHIELD Coordination

Review Working Groups progress

THANK YOU to all the WG Chairs for their effort in moving SHIELD work forward!!!

Setting milestones for deliverables should be NEXT for WGs: they will be captured here: SHIELD WG Deliverables and Milestone Grid

Roadmap section updates in response to ONC comments on the SHIELD roadmap

  1. The roadmap mission section describes a broad vision of lab interoperability. However, the roadmap proposed solution is limited to the FDA use cases around In-vitro diagnostics (IVD) data, specifically populating the IVD data hub.  ONC suggests clearly describing the roadmap scope so the proposed solutions can be discussed within that context.

Updated language draft: Roadmap update: ONC Feedback

maybe add one more sentence or add a reference to the key consideration number for the IVD Datahub (Consideration 4) into these sentences. (change approved in principle.)

Discussion:

  • Updated roadmap:

  • Also need to remove the duplicate words “for the” in the last sentence

  • Anything else needed on this one?

  1. The roadmap identifies training and education needs around using LOINC as a barrier to interoperability. ONC suggests clarifying how the roadmap addresses this barrier. ONC recognizes that terminologies require training and education, and replacing LOINC with another standard will not address the barrier.

Update from Standards and Vocab WG about re-write of this section - from their March 18th call (notes here, recording here)

  1. Concepts around Healthcare IT (HIT) standards needs to be conveyed earlier in training for healthcare providers as use and application of standards in vended applications is the major gap.

  2. Decision making to use Health IT standards are less likely left up to IT analysts as they mainly follow the requirements and then they generally use vendor supplied implementation guidance. However, a vendor may not support functionality for standards or only partially support.

  3. Regulatory requirements (such as CLIA) may pose a hurdle to implementation of data standards.

  4. Implementation guidance is often not well read. Training resources may not be well publicized or readily available. Perhaps conformance testing tools need to be made more widely available?

  5. What might be helpful is to look at standards implementation from a data lifecycle standpoint across all users (end to end across ecosystem), rather than just training on a single standard for a single use case.

  6. Last paragraph on page 4 of the road map final version could be augmented with these points.

Discussion:

  • Need to find the exact space for these points, too

  1. There are several solutions proposed, including repositories and tools, which need to be further evaluated before ONC could fully support the roadmap.  ONC suggests the roadmap be updated to include details around feasibility, scalability and how the proposed changes can be integrated into the current laboratory ecosystem (e.g., regulation and industry).

Identify components that could improve the ecosystem infrastructure, and then highlight the places where these components can be advanced / sustained or made easier to implement. Would SHIELD be willing to consider to provide an example implementation - create the structures and bound terminologies to showcase how each element would be properly represented be working.

For each of the Consideration sections we could certainly add a section on feasibility / requirements (e.g. continued funding for LIDR, better describing the intended use of ANY data element added, overall goal of LIDR, clearly delineate what is commonly used and is minimum, provide best practice and alternatives (non-preferred) - example would be metadata around the value sets in VSAC (curation / usage etc) to be able to ascertain quality) and highlight that other mechanisms are needed to achieve for adoption.

Antimicrobial result reporting

Placeholder to get back to later

Related work at HL7 Europe:

Next calls

All SHIELD Calls

  • January 21st

  • February 25th (Andrea to host - Christina to support)

  • March 25th

General Updates: 2024 - WG Chairs please make sure we have material for updates (at least notes we can link to)

Special Topic:

  • February 11th - Update from ONC’s Annual Meeting / Enhancing Laboratory Interoperability: Insights and a Path Forward Panel

  • March 11th - Synensis Report update

Steering Committee:

  • February 10th

Adjourned

  PM ET

From Chat:

  •  

Action items

Quick decisions not requiring context or tracking

For quick, smaller decisions that do not require extra context or formal tracking, use the “Add a decision…” function here.

Decisions requiring context or tracking

For decisions that require more context (e.g., documentation of discussion, options considered) and/or tracking, use the decision template to capture more information.