2025-01-27 Steering Committee Meeting Notes
Date
Jan 27, 2025
Attendees
(bolded names indicate attendance)
Stakeholder group | SHIELD organization | Name of SHIELD member | organization designation |
Industry Entity | Labgnostic, Inc. - OPEN? | Steve Box | primary |
| NEED NEW | alternate | |
Epic | Dan Rutz | primary | |
|
| alternate | |
Biomerieux | Xavier Gansel | primary | |
|
| alternate | |
Roche | Nick Decker - regrets | primary | |
Roche | Yue Jin | alternate | |
Healthcare Provider | Indiana University/Indiana University Health/Association for Molecular Pathology | Mehdi Nassiri, MD | primary |
University of Wisconsin-Madison | Andrea Pitkus, PhD, MLS(ASCP)CM, FAMIA | primary | |
UT Southwestern Medical Center | Hung Luu | primary | |
UNMC | Scott Campbell | primary | |
OPEN | OPEN | primary | |
Sonic Healthcare | Eric Crugnale | primary | |
Former Quest Diagnostics - OPEN? | Collom, Craig D | primary | |
Patient Advocate | OPEN? | Stacy Lange | individual |
Standards Organization | SNOMED International
| Jim Case | primary |
Monica Harry | alternate | ||
Regenstrief Institute
| Marjorie Rallins | primary | |
Eza Hafeza | alternate | ||
HL7
| Julia Skapik | primary | |
| alternate | ||
Professional Organization | Association of Public Health Laboratories
| Riki Merrick | primary |
Christina Gallegos | alternate | ||
Graphite Health
| Stan Huff | primary | |
| alternate | ||
CAP
| Raj Dash | primary | |
| alternate | ||
AMP
| Robyn Temple | primary | |
| alternate | ||
Governmental - non Voting | CMS | Michael Smalara - regrets | primary |
Open | alternate | ||
ASTP/ONC | Sara Armson - regrets | primary | |
| alternate | ||
CDC | Hubert Vesper - regrets (/DDNID/NCEH/DLS) | primary | |
Jasmine Chaitram | alternate | ||
NLM | John Snyder - regrets | primary | |
| alternate | ||
FDA | Keith Campbell - regrets | primary | |
Victoria Derbyshire | alternate |
Agenda and Notes
Item | Notes |
---|---|
Quorum evaluation (two-thirds (2/3) of the Voting Representatives shall be necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business) | Currently we have 18 named members, so 2/3 = 12 (excluding chair and government members). # of voting member per charter: 13 - 21 # of non-voting members per charter: 7
|
Open Meeting | 1:09 PM ET - no quorum |
SHIELD Membership Requests |
Also now have an offical Quest Diagnostics participant again = Matthew Allison |
Steering Committee Membership and Officer Roles |
|
Conferences | AMIA November 15 - 19 in Atlanta, GA - proposals are open till 3/19 https://amia.org/education-events/amia-2025-annual-symposium/call-participation LOINC 7-10 October in Montreal, Canada - proposals are open till 3/30 https://loinc.org/conference/montreal-2025/presentations/ ASCLS got accepted - waiting for exact date/time ADLM got submitted - waiting for response Notes from the FDA Collaborative Community Panel are here: FDA CDRH Collaborative Community Panel |
Other presentations to folks at FDA? |
|
Report of SHIELD achievements for 2024 | 4 active SHIELD Working Groups plus the Steering Committee Total of 104 calls held in 2024 which include:
Presentations
Provided feedback on 2 federal regulation/initiatives in 2024: USCDI V5 and Proposed HTI-2 Rule List of the speakers on the Special Topics calls in 2024:
Several members of SHIELD are supporting HITECH and Sequoia Laboratory Data Interoperability Implementation Guide 5 articles referencing SHIELD work, which are linked to from our website SHIELD Coordination |
Review Working Groups progress | THANK YOU to all the WG Chairs for their effort in moving SHIELD work forward!!! Setting milestones for deliverables should be NEXT for WGs: they will be captured here: SHIELD WG Deliverables and Milestone Grid
|
Roadmap section updates in response to ONC comments on the SHIELD roadmap |
Updated language draft: Roadmap update: ONC Feedback maybe add one more sentence or add a reference to the key consideration number for the IVD Datahub (Consideration 4) into these sentences. (change approved in principle.) Discussion:
Update from Standards and Vocab WG about re-write of this section - from their March 18th call (notes here, recording here)
Discussion:
Identify components that could improve the ecosystem infrastructure, and then highlight the places where these components can be advanced / sustained or made easier to implement. Would SHIELD be willing to consider to provide an example implementation - create the structures and bound terminologies to showcase how each element would be properly represented be working. For each of the Consideration sections we could certainly add a section on feasibility / requirements (e.g. continued funding for LIDR, better describing the intended use of ANY data element added, overall goal of LIDR, clearly delineate what is commonly used and is minimum, provide best practice and alternatives (non-preferred) - example would be metadata around the value sets in VSAC (curation / usage etc) to be able to ascertain quality) and highlight that other mechanisms are needed to achieve for adoption. |
Antimicrobial result reporting | Placeholder to get back to later Related work at HL7 Europe: |
Next calls | All SHIELD Calls
General Updates: 2024 - WG Chairs please make sure we have material for updates (at least notes we can link to) Special Topic:
Steering Committee:
|
Adjourned | PM ET |
From Chat:
Action items
Quick decisions not requiring context or tracking
For quick, smaller decisions that do not require extra context or formal tracking, use the “Add a decision…” function here.
Decisions requiring context or tracking
For decisions that require more context (e.g., documentation of discussion, options considered) and/or tracking, use the decision template to capture more information.