Date
Mar 24, 2025
Attendees
(bolded names indicate attendance)
Stakeholder group | SHIELD organization | Name of SHIELD member | organization designation |
Industry Entity | Labgnostic, Inc. | Steve Box | primary |
| alternate | ||
Epic | Dan Rutz | primary | |
|
| alternate | |
Biomerieux | Xavier Gansel | primary | |
|
| alternate | |
Roche | Nick Decker | primary | |
Roche | Yue Jin | alternate | |
Healthcare Provider | Indiana University/Indiana University Health/Association for Molecular Pathology | Mehdi Nassiri, MD | primary |
University of Wisconsin-Madison | Andrea Pitkus, PhD, MLS(ASCP)CM, FAMIA | primary | |
UT Southwestern Medical Center | Hung Luu | primary | |
UNMC | Scott Campbell | primary | |
OPEN | OPEN | primary | |
Sonic Healthcare | Eric Crugnale | primary | |
Former Quest Diagnostics - OPEN? | Collom, Craig D | primary | |
Patient Advocate | OPEN | OPEN | individual |
Standards Organization | SNOMED International
| Jim Case | primary |
Monica Harry | alternate | ||
Regenstrief Institute
| Marjorie Rallins | primary | |
Eza Hafeza | alternate | ||
HL7
| Julia Skapik | primary | |
| alternate | ||
Professional Organization | Association of Public Health Laboratories
| Riki Merrick | primary |
Christina Gallegos | alternate | ||
Graphite Health
| Stan Huff | primary | |
| alternate | ||
CAP
| Raj Dash - regrets | primary | |
| alternate | ||
AMP
| Robyn Temple | primary | |
| alternate | ||
Governmental - non Voting | CMS | Michael Smalara | primary |
Open | alternate | ||
ASTP/ONC | Sara Armson | primary | |
| alternate | ||
CDC | Hubert Vesper (/DDNID/NCEH/DLS) | primary | |
Jasmine Chaitram | alternate | ||
NLM | John Snyder | primary | |
| alternate | ||
FDA | Keith Campbell | primary | |
Victoria Derbyshire | alternate |
Agenda and Notes
Item | Notes |
---|---|
Quorum evaluation (two-thirds (2/3) of the Voting Representatives shall be necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business) | Currently we have 17 named members (2 open slots), so 2/3 = 11 is quorum (excluding chair and government members). # of voting member per charter: 13 - 21 # of non-voting members per charter: 7
|
Open Meeting | 1:07 PM ET, no quorum |
Conferences/Time critical things | AMIA November 15 - 19 in Atlanta, GA https://amia.org/education-events/amia-2025-annual-symposium/call-participation submitted proposal LOINC 7-10 October in Montreal, Canada - proposals are open till 3/30 https://loinc.org/conference/montreal-2025/presentations/ ASCLS presentation is scheduled for June 11, 2025, 8 - 9 AM PT https://aphlinformatics.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/SC/pages/3052175362 - when to work on this next? |
Find New Meeting Time | https://www.when2meet.com/?29478083-E8yoY Have 11 entries - none that work for everyone Best spot first and second Wednesday 12 -1 PM ET, so will send meeting invite out for that timeslot |
Update on Elections | Chair: Riki Merrick (Votes: 10 - Andrea Pitkus = 2) Co-Chair: Andrea Pitkus (Votes: 8 - Riki Merrick = 1, Eric Crugnale = 4) Thanks to all who voted and to Eric for putting his name in the hat. |
SHIELD Charter Updates as shared via email sent to SC members on | https://aphlinformatics.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/SC/pages/3071279178 - Review the updated Article Three of the Charter as a whole Send off to Steering Committee for voting via email Note: Changes to the Charter require unanimous approval by the Steering Committee |
Steering Committee Composition | These slots are potentially open:
|
Review Working Groups progress | THANK YOU to all the WG Chairs for their effort in moving SHIELD work forward!!! Setting milestones for deliverables should be NEXT for WGs: they will be captured here: SHIELD WG Deliverables and Milestone Grid
|
Review Items | https://aphlinformatics.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/SC/pages/2020966449 was open for SC review and comment until Feb 21, 2025 - Riki has not received any via email, LIDR WG members comments all have been addressed - will extend the comment period to April 7th and discuss on the SC call on April 16th https://www.jmdjournal.org/article/S1525-1578(21)00327-5/fulltext AMP paper - do we need to do something with this as the Steering Committee? |
Roadmap section updates in response to ONC comments on the SHIELD roadmap | Riki will prep this section better before the next call - it has been a while since we looked at this one - ideally we’ll have complete updated roadmap document to approve soon.
Updated language draft: Roadmap update: ONC Feedback maybe add one more sentence or add a reference to the key consideration number for the IVD Datahub (Consideration 4) into these sentences. (change approved in principle.) Discussion:
Update from Standards and Vocab WG about re-write of this section - from their March 18th call (notes here, recording here)
Discussion:
Identify components that could improve the ecosystem infrastructure, and then highlight the places where these components can be advanced / sustained or made easier to implement. Would SHIELD be willing to consider to provide an example implementation - create the structures and bound terminologies to showcase how each element would be properly represented be working. For each of the Consideration sections we could certainly add a section on feasibility / requirements (e.g. continued funding for LIDR, better describing the intended use of ANY data element added, overall goal of LIDR, clearly delineate what is commonly used and is minimum, provide best practice and alternatives (non-preferred) - example would be metadata around the value sets in VSAC (curation / usage etc) to be able to ascertain quality) and highlight that other mechanisms are needed to achieve for adoption. |
Antimicrobial result reporting | Placeholder to get back to later Related work at HL7 Europe: https://www.jmdjournal.org/article/S1525-1578(21)00327-5/fulltext |
Other presentations to folks at FDA? |
|
Next calls | All SHIELD Calls
General Updates: 2024 - WG Chairs please make sure we have material for updates (at least notes we can link to) Special Topic:
Steering Committee:
|
Adjourned | 154 PM ET |
From Chat:
Action items
Quick decisions not requiring context or tracking
For quick, smaller decisions that do not require extra context or formal tracking, use the “Add a decision…” function here.
Decisions requiring context or tracking
For decisions that require more context (e.g., documentation of discussion, options considered) and/or tracking, use the decision template to capture more information.