2024-08-06 Steering Committee Meeting Notes
Date
Aug 6, 2024
Attendees
(bolded names indicate attendance)
Stakeholder group | SHIELD organization | Name of SHIELD member | organization designation |
Industry Entity | Labgnostic, Inc. | Steve Box | primary |
| Andy Harris | alternate | |
Epic | Dan Rutz | primary | |
|
| alternate | |
Biomerieux | Xavier Gansel - regrets | primary | |
|
| alternate | |
Roche | Nick Decker | primary | |
Roche | Yue Jin | alternate | |
Healthcare Provider | Indiana University/Indiana University Health/Association for Molecular Pathology | Mehdi Nassiri, MD | primary |
University of Wisconsin-Madison | Andrea Pitkus, PhD, MLS(ASCP)CM, FAMIA | primary | |
UT Southwestern Medical Center | Hung Luu - regrets | primary | |
UNMC | Scott Campbell | primary | |
Tufts Medical Center | Nanguneri Nirmala - regrets | primary | |
Sonic Healthcare | Eric Crugnale | primary | |
Former Quest Diagnostics | Collom, Craig D | primary | |
Patient Advocate |
| Stacy Lange | individual |
Standards Organization | SNOMED International
| Jim Case | primary |
Monica Harry - regrets | alternate | ||
Regenstrief Institute
| Marjorie Rallins - | primary | |
Eza Hafeza | alternate | ||
HL7
| Julia Skapik | primary | |
| alternate | ||
Professional Organization | Association of Public Health Laboratories
| Riki Merrick- regrets | primary |
Dari Shirazi | alternate | ||
Graphite Health
| Stan Huff | primary | |
| alternate | ||
CAP
| Raj Dash | primary | |
| alternate | ||
AMP
| Robyn Temple | primary | |
| alternate | ||
Governmental - non Voting | CMS | Michael Smalara | primary |
Open | alternate | ||
ONC | Sara Armson | primary | |
| alternate | ||
CDC | Hubert Vesper (/DDNID/NCEH/DLS) | primary | |
Jasmine Chaitram | alternate | ||
NLM | John Snyder | primary | |
| alternate | ||
FDA | Keith Campbell | primary | |
Victoria Derbyshire - regrets last 30 min | alternate |
Agenda and Notes
Item | Notes |
---|---|
Quorum evaluation (two-thirds (2/3) of the Voting Representatives shall be necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business) | Currently we have 19 named members, so 2/3 = 12 (excluding chair and government members).
|
Open Meeting | 12:09 PM ET |
Follow up Items - |
|
HTI-2 Proposed Rule released | Once posted in Federal Register will have 60 days for public comment. Oct 4, 2024 Comments are Due Starting HTI-2 Feedback Collection |
USCDI / USCDI+ feedback | Discussion about differences between Lab Orders, Procedure, Clinical Test Orders in USCDI. Sara indicated HL7 Cross Group Projects (CGP) WG call is best place for feedback - Every Thursday 1-2 PM ET - https://www.hl7.org/concalls/CallDetails.cfm?concall=73923 - check the main calendar https://www.hl7.org/concalls/ , if happening for the week, or better sign up for the listserve https://www.hl7.org/myhl7/managelistservs.cfm?ref=nav , so you get call notifications. Robyn mentioned the definitions for the items are broad. Andrea mentioned CPT and SCT use of terms. |
Administrative things | Review SC Composition, terms and requirements for re-voting:
|
Review Working Groups progress | Setting milestones for deliverables should be NEXT for WGs: they will be captured here: SHIELDleG Deliverables and Milestone Grid
|
Roadmap section updates in response to ONC comments on the SHIELD roadmap |
Updated language draft: Roadmap update: ONC Feedback
Update from Standards and Vocab WG about re-write of this section - from their March 18th call (notes here, recording here)
Identify components that could improve the ecosystem infrastructure, and then highlight the places where these components can be advanced / sustained or made easier to implement. Would SHIELD be willing to consider to provide an example implementation - create the structures and bound terminologies to showcase how each element would be properly represented be working. Looking for volunteer to tackle this re-write: For each of the Consideration sections we could certainly add a section on feasibility / requirements (e.g. continued funding for LIDR, better describing the intended use of ANY data element added, overall goal of LIDR, clearly delineate what is commonly used and is minimum, provide best practice and alternatives (non-preferred) - example would be metadata around the value sets in VSAC (curation / usage etc) to be able to ascertain quality) and highlight that other mechanisms are needed to achieve for adoption. |
Will look at LRI first. | |
Antimicrobial result reporting | Placeholder to get back to later Related work at HL7 Europe: |
Next calls | All SHIELD: General Updates: August, 2024 - WG Chairs please make sure we have material for updates (at least notes we can link to) Special Topic: August 13 - Scott’s SNOMED talk August 20 - ALL SHIELD HTI-2 August 27 - ALL SHIELD Steering Committee: Sept 3 - SC (please re- send invite) Sept 17- Cancel due to LOINC |
Adjourned |
|
From Chat:
Action items
Quick decisions not requiring context or tracking
For quick, smaller decisions that do not require extra context or formal tracking, use the “Add a decision…” function here.
Decisions requiring context or tracking
For decisions that require more context (e.g., documentation of discussion, options considered) and/or tracking, use the decision template to capture more information.