Date

Jul 13, 2022 1 PM CT

Invitees

Present

Last Name

First Name

Organization

E-Mail

Stakeholder group

Yes

Merrick (Co-Chair)

Riki

APHL

 riki.merrick@aphl.org

Professional Association - Lab

Yes

Luu (Co-Chair)

Hung

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Hung.Luu@utsouthwestern.edu

University (or CAP)

No

Andreasen

Ketty

Epic Software

Ketty@epic.com

LIS vendor

Yes

Banning

Pam

3M

pdbanning@mmm.com

Terminology Services

No

Buitendijk

Hans

Cerner or EHRA?

Hans.Buitendijk@Cerner.com

LIS vendor

Yes

Campbell

Scott

University of Nebraska Medical Center

wcampbel@unmc.edu

University (or CAP)

No

Case

Jim

Snomed International

jca@snomed.org

SDO

No

Emrick

Steven

IMO

semrick@imohealth.com

Terminology Services

Yes

Hafeza

Eza

Regenstrief Institute

ehafeza@regenstrief.org

SDO

No

Hall

Freida

Quest Diagnostics / ACLA

Freida.X.Hall@questdiagnostics.com

Professional Association - Lab

Yes

Heierman

Ed

Abbott / IICC

Ed.Heierman@abbott.com'

Professional Association - IVD Vendor

Yes

Hiller

Carolyn

Reagan-Udall Foundation

chiller@reaganudall.org


Yes

Huff

Stan

Graphite

stan.huff@graphitehealth.io


Yes

Jonnaert

Serge

IICC

serge.jonnaert@ivdconnectivity.org

Professional Association - IVD Vendor

Yes

Kennedy

Mary

CAP

mkenned@cap.org

Professional Association - Lab

Yes

Kegerize

Joan

ACLA

jkegerize@acla.com

Professional Association - Lab

Yes

Nassiri

Mehdi

Indiana University

mnassiri@iupui.edu

University (AMP SME)

Yes

Nirmala

Nanguneri

Tufts Medical Center

NNirmala@tuftsmedicalcenter.org

University

Yes

Phillips

Ann

IMO

APhillips@imohealth.com

Terminology Services

Yes

Pitkus

Andrea

University of Wisconsin

apitkus@gmail.com

University

Yes

Rallins

Marjorie

Regenstrief Institute

mrallins@regenstrief.org

SDO

No

Sapiente

Joe

MDIC

jsapiente@mdic.org


No

Smith

Jeffrey

Kaiser Permanente

Jeffrey.R.Smith@kp.org

Health Care Provider

No

Hausam

Rob

Hausam Consulting

rrhausam@gmail.com

Standards development and implementation

Yes

Polen

Molly

AACC

mpolen@aacc.org

Professional Association - Lab

Yes

Nwachuku

Crystal

NACHC



Yes

Skapik

Julia

NACHC

JSkapik@nachc.org


Yes

Uy

Raymonde

NACHC



Yes

de Baca

Monica

Independent Pathologist



Goals

Discussion Topics

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

12 Minutes

Roll Call and 30-Second Introductions of Each Member

Huguelet

  • N/A

3 Minutes

Overview of Meeting Agenda and Goals

Huguelet / Merrick

  • N/A

2 Minutes

Discuss Meeting Candance and Attendance/Substitution/Quorum Rules During Re-Organization

Huguelet / Merrick

  • Weekly cadence will be Wednesdays at 1 PM CT

  • Desire to keep the meetings informal during Charter creation

    • More formality will come into place for the post-Reorganization Committee, steady-state era and this will be embodied in the Charter

20 Minutes

Briefly Introduce Current Draft https://aphlinformatics.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/SC/pages/1474887699, Section by Section

  • Anti-Goal for Today: not to “deep dive” into refining any particular section

  • Goal: Identify owner for each section to lead the refinement/authoring

  • Is the current draft the best starting point or does another existing “charter” document represent a better start?

  • Are there major sections missing?

    • Funding

    • IP Considerations

    • Anti-Trust Considerations

Huguelet / Merrick

  • The key deliverable of the Re-Organization Committee is the creation of the SHIELD Community Charter document

  • Dr. Hung Luu presented initial suggestions for the Charter around the creation of a Steering Committee, Subcommittees, and voting

  • Consensus that the Charter will need to include sections for vision, mission, committee structures and processes, membership requirements, decision making practices, IP, and anti-trust.

  • In creating the Charter, we need to first focus on the vision & mission for the SHIELD Community before outlining the administrative tactics that the SHIELD Community will use in its operation (e.g., quorums, voting, etc.)

Jim Huguelet to take consensus around sections required in charter and create an updated charter for review at the subsequent meeting

15 Minutes

Discussion on Suggested Use of HL7 Decision Making Practices

  • Anti-Goal for Today: not to “deep dive” into landing a full DMP

  • Goal: Identify owner to lead the refinement/authoring of the DMP

  • Is the full HL7 process fit for purpose?

Huguelet / Merrick

  • This was not discussed

3 Minutes

Confirm Next Meeting on Wednesday Jul 20, 2022 at 2-3 PM ET


Potential Agenda Topics:

  • Review refined drafts of one or more specific charter sections

    • Review refined decision making process

  • Review list of committees to determine if any missing/not needed

Huguelet